In a landmark ruling that should be banner headlines in the mainstream media but isn’t, the European Court of Justice ruled that doctors who injected people with the toxic experimental C19 modified mRNA and viral vector injections are liable for all deaths and harms caused. The media silence on this ruling is deafening. They continue to lie to us by omission.
This opens the floodgates for a clamour of personal cases to be brought against medics who caused death and harm from the experimental C19 modified mRNA and viral vector injections in the EU.
According to a ruling by the European Court of Justice, “all healthcare professionals who urged or vaccinated you against Covid are civilly and criminally liable.”
Civil and Criminal Liability
“Professor Frajese‘s case before the European Court of Justice had a surprising outcome! According to the Court, a medical prescription was required to administer the anti-Covid vaccines. But there’s more: doctors could have chosen whether or not to administer them, and even advised against them, to such an extent that the potential civil and criminal liability of healthcare professionals is attributable to the specific case.”
The reasons given by the Court could thus call into question the disciplinary and criminal proceedings brought against doctors who opposed vaccinations. Instead it attributes serious responsibilities on the doctors who vaccinated “without ifs or buts”, thus promoting the risk of causing adverse events.
Specific Liability of Vaccinating Physicians
“The Court had to confirm, even in a brief parenthesis, that the Commission’s decisions to authorize marketing “do not entail any obligation on doctors to prescribe and administer the said vaccines to their patients”.
Additionally, it confirms the specific liability of vaccinating physicians who have administered the drug inversely, without adequately assessing the appropriateness, risks and safety in the specific case of the patient treated.”
Violation of the Law
“– In this case, the medical treatment was administered “in violation of the law” due to the absence of a prior medical prescription (repeatable restrictive prescription, known as RRL). In trying to explain in terms understandable to those outside the sector, the penal shield only works if the medical treatment is administered in accordance with the indications laid down in the authorization acts, which in this case were disregarded, and not just for lack of a careful and adequate medical assessment of each patient hesitating in the formal act of prescribing. “The timing and number of doses administered were very often not consistent with the indications in force at the time of the various administrations, and this prevents the penal shield from being operational”.
Vaccine Pushers
Politicians such as Simon Harris and the arch vellian Stephen Donnelly, the mainstream media propagandists, the regulators, the HSE who are still pushing it and all so called health advisors can continue to “push” the toxic “vaccines” as much as they like, but it is strictly the doctors who are responsible for the outcomes. It seems that the constant fear mongering pushers of the vaccine are off the hook for now. They all lied to us and continue to do so.